False Deaths: Should They Be Used?

False Deaths: Should They Be Used?

Having characters fake their own death, actually "dying" and coming back, or any variation thereof is super common these days. Is it really a kids movie if a character doesn't "die" and then turn out to be okay?

I watched Rise of the Titans, the final installment in the Tales of Arcadia universe, the other day, and the ending made me think about this topic again. (We'll talk more about this movie in a minute.) Faux deaths are running rampant in our media, especially in movies, and I'm not sure that's a good thing. Allow me to explain why.


Death Is Not Trivial

I understand why faux death is so popular. We want to feel like these characters are in actual danger, and not protected by plot armor. What better way to make the conflict and danger feel real than killing of one of the major characters?

But, especially in kids movies, I feel like this can be more harmful than helpful. Kids need to understand that death is real, not something that can be fixed through magic or good thoughts. It's getting to the point where I see a character die and I count the seconds until they come back to life.

Death is a real, sad thing, brought on by the consequences of our sins. But if you believe in Jesus, then you also have a promise of living forever with him after death. Which brings me to my next point.

Death and Resurrection

I find it interesting that our films seem to be obsessed with coming back from death. Especially because that is such a big part of Christian faith. Even though the world might not see it, they're still reflecting the wonderful deeds that God has done.

Humans are afraid of death, because deep down they know they are sinful and in need of saving. I think that's why we strive so hard to live as long as possible, and make death seem like a bad thing. That is reflected time and time again in our stories.

What are stories but a reflection of the truth? They remind us of what's important in the world, or encourage us to be better. They bring light and truth. Even stories by worldly people can still speak the truth, whether they meant it or not.

So yes, it kind of amuses me that in a world that rejects God so often, they still fashion their stories after the greatest story of all.

The Big Problem

It all comes down to the fact that when you fake kill and bring back to life everyone in sight, it diminishes the power of death, which is an excellent story tool, as well as an important lesson. Death becomes nothing more than another punch to the face, that our characters can just shake off without lasting consequences.

Let's go back to Rise of the Titans. (Spoilers if you haven't seen it yet.) Throughout the film, a lot of major characters from the franchise die. The characters, and the audience, barely get a moment to mourn, which is a big indicator that this isn't how it's going to end.

Then we get to the last big battle, where Jim has to reclaim his power (it's complicated) and fight the final Titan alone. His best friend, Tobey, helps him in the last moments of the battle, giving him the edge he needs to win. The Titan collapses and everyone is "Oh no, where's Jim?". He comes out of the smoke and rubble, as heroes do. Whew. Until we realize Tobey is missing. Surprise, he sacrificed himself and now he's dead.

This may sound harsh, but if they had actually killed all those characters, even Tobey, and given them a noble death, and given us time to mourn their loss, then it would have been great. Their victory would have been sad, but earned. I mean, this is the one Tales of Arcadia thing where I felt like people actually died.

Instead, Jim decides to use the time stone thingy he got earlier in the movie to go back in time and do it all over again, but different. Oh, and he somehow made Tobey the Trollhunter, which is an issue for a completely different post. It triggers me to think about, so let's move on.

But because of that choice, all those deaths felt cheap. What was the point if they were all going to come back and do it again, the "right" way? Trollhunters has always been a franchise I felt like took things seriously, until this movie. Actions had consequences.

The same goes for any story where people are killed only to come back. When you take away the true harshness of death, then it makes the stakes of the story seem weak.

Kill Those Darlings

Literally. Kill them. And let them stay dead. If you do it thoughtfully, then it becomes a powerful and memorable part of your story. Look at Tadashi from Big Hero 6. His death hurts me to this day. But the fact that he died and stayed dead is what drives the plot and a lot of Hiro's actions. If he'd come back, the whole story would have weakened.

Remind us that death is real. That doesn't mean we let fear of it rule over us, but we can't deny it any more than we can deny that the sun comes up every day. If you use character deaths to mean something, not just for shock value, than you can bring depth to your story that many films are lacking today.


What are your thoughts on faux death? What's one that really irks you? Tell me in the comments!

Suggested Posts:



Comments

  1. The appeal of a fake death is that, on the surface at least, it lets the author have it both ways: the high-stakes and tension of a life-and-death struggle, yet also not having to deal with the fan backlash of killing off a beloved character. Fan backlash is a real concern for some, by the way--I believe the first ever print appearance of the fake death trope was when Sherlock Holmes fell off a cliff in his struggle with Moriarty. He was dead, but fanboi nerdrage, even in the late 1800s, was sufficiently fierce that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle felt compelled to bring him back, even though he had not originally planned to. That was bad enough in itself, but it started the trope of beloved characters falling off cliffs, yet always somehow surviving. It is too the point where if you see a character fall off a cliff (or "die" in an explosion), it carries zero emotional force because it literally never occurs to the audience that they might be dead. So it actually does not let the author have it both ways: the tension and the stakes are gone. Seeing a character go over a cliff or seemingly not making it out of the explosion radius in time has about as much dramatic tension as Tom Cruise dying for the 417th time in Edge of Tomorrow. At some point, it all just became absurd self-parody.

    Deaths that actually do stick, as the Song of Fire and Ice books, or the Divergence books, have emotional resonance. They are sad, but the whole point of art is to make you feel something. And fans complain about those deaths, of course, but the popularity of those works just goes to show that fans do not actually consciously know what they want.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love your thoughts on this topic and I 100% agree. The audience should be taken into account when creating a story, but not the point where they run what happens. They never know what's best.

      Delete
  2. YES. EXACTLY. Fake deaths are the WORST nine times out of ten. They *can* be done well, but they're usually *not*. You really have to earn a resurrection or make it the most sensible option for it not to bother me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is so hard to do a fake death well, it's just better to skip it.

      Delete
  3. Ughhhh that movie!! *mimes choking someone* I just hated it...I'm glad you talked about that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was such a disappointment after how good the rest of the series was. So frustrating.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts